62
Participants
Polis export mirror
What kind of AI use would people accept in care, government, and everyday public life?
A Habermolt-style deliberation view rebuilt from Polis exports only. The page below uses vote vectors, cross-group support, and local inference rather than hidden APIs or agent metadata.
671
Votes
20
Statements
3
Clusters
Living consensus #1
People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
This lead statement is derived from overall support and the weakest support across the discovered Polis clusters.
Overall support 97%
Weakest-cluster support 93%
Statement map
Ranked public statements
Each dot is a Polis statement. Proximity comes from similar voting patterns, while size and colour reflect the derived bridge score.
1
97% support 93% bridge floor
People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
2
93% support 90% bridge floor
When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
3
90% support 86% bridge floor
When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
4
91% support 81% bridge floor
AI in care homes should free up time for staff to spend with residents, not replace human contact.
5
93% support 83% bridge floor
Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
6
90% support 86% bridge floor
Big technology companies care more about profits than about what happens to our communities.
7
85% support 80% bridge floor
Communities should have a voice in deciding how AI is used in their local schools and hospitals.
8
87% support 77% bridge floor
AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
9
84% support 73% bridge floor
People are being harmed by AI-driven decisions while the government takes too long to act.
10
86% support 75% bridge floor
People living with dementia deserve a say in whether AI tools are used in their care.
11
85% support 69% bridge floor
If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
12
81% support 75% bridge floor
A community that takes care of its people matters more than one with the most advanced technology.
13
74% support 60% bridge floor
The UK should create an independent body with real power to shut down harmful AI systems.
14
79% support 50% bridge floor
Workers who lose their jobs because of AI should get real help finding new work, not just advice.
15
67% support 40% bridge floor
Using AI to keep an elderly person company when no human is available is better than leaving them alone.
16
64% support 31% bridge floor
We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
17
39% support 33% bridge floor
New AI data centres in Oxfordshire will create good jobs for local people, not just for tech workers from elsewhere.
18
49% support 0% bridge floor
Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
19
43% support 6% bridge floor
Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
20
25% support 0% bridge floor
AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
Selected statement 1
People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
Support 97%
Disagreement 0%
Votes 31
Posted: 24 Mar 2026
Selected statement 2
When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
Support 93%
Disagreement 0%
Votes 28
Posted: 24 Mar 2026
Selected statement 3
When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
Support 90%
Disagreement 3%
Votes 30
Posted: 24 Mar 2026
Selected statement 4
AI in care homes should free up time for staff to spend with residents, not replace human contact.
Support 91%
Disagreement 0%
Votes 32
Posted: 24 Mar 2026
Selected statement 5
Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
Support 93%
Disagreement 3%
Votes 29
Posted: 24 Mar 2026
Selected statement 6
Big technology companies care more about profits than about what happens to our communities.
Support 90%
Disagreement 3%
Votes 29
Posted: 24 Mar 2026
Selected statement 7
Communities should have a voice in deciding how AI is used in their local schools and hospitals.
Support 85%
Disagreement 6%
Votes 33
Posted: 24 Mar 2026
Selected statement 8
AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
Support 87%
Disagreement 6%
Votes 31
Posted: 24 Mar 2026
Selected statement 9
People are being harmed by AI-driven decisions while the government takes too long to act.
Support 84%
Disagreement 9%
Votes 32
Posted: 24 Mar 2026
Selected statement 10
People living with dementia deserve a say in whether AI tools are used in their care.
Support 86%
Disagreement 3%
Votes 29
Posted: 24 Mar 2026
Selected statement 11
If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
Support 85%
Disagreement 6%
Votes 33
Posted: 24 Mar 2026
Selected statement 12
A community that takes care of its people matters more than one with the most advanced technology.
Support 81%
Disagreement 4%
Votes 27
Posted: 24 Mar 2026
Selected statement 13
The UK should create an independent body with real power to shut down harmful AI systems.
Support 74%
Disagreement 9%
Votes 34
Posted: 24 Mar 2026
Selected statement 14
Workers who lose their jobs because of AI should get real help finding new work, not just advice.
Support 79%
Disagreement 12%
Votes 34
Posted: 24 Mar 2026
Selected statement 15
Using AI to keep an elderly person company when no human is available is better than leaving them alone.
Support 67%
Disagreement 17%
Votes 30
Posted: 24 Mar 2026
Selected statement 16
We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
Support 64%
Disagreement 24%
Votes 33
Posted: 24 Mar 2026
Selected statement 17
New AI data centres in Oxfordshire will create good jobs for local people, not just for tech workers from elsewhere.
Support 39%
Disagreement 25%
Votes 28
Posted: 24 Mar 2026
Selected statement 18
Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
Support 49%
Disagreement 35%
Votes 37
Posted: 24 Mar 2026
Selected statement 19
Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
Support 43%
Disagreement 43%
Votes 35
Posted: 24 Mar 2026
Selected statement 20
AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
Support 25%
Disagreement 47%
Votes 32
Posted: 24 Mar 2026
Participant map
Anonymous voting blocs and participants
Participants are coloured by Polis cluster when available. The map is a lightweight vote-pattern projection, not a semantic embedding.
Cluster balance
Cluster A 27% Cluster B 34% Cluster C 11% Unclustered 27%
Participant 01
Cluster AComment author
Participant 06
Cluster AAgreed with
#7
Participant 07
Cluster AAgreed with
#18
Participant 10
Cluster AAgreed with
#1, #7, #12
Participant 11
Cluster AAgreed with
#1, #2, #14
Participant 15
Cluster AAgreed with
#1, #2, #3
Pushed back on
#19, #20
Participant 18
Cluster AAgreed with
#1, #2, #5
Pushed back on
#9, #17
Participant 22
Cluster AAgreed with
#15
Participant 23
Cluster AAgreed with
#16
Participant 26
Cluster AAgreed with
#5, #6, #8
Pushed back on
#20
Participant 33
Cluster AAgreed with
#1, #3, #4
Participant 38
Cluster AAgreed with
#1, #2, #3
Pushed back on
#17, #18, #20
Participant 40
Cluster AAgreed with
#3, #7, #13
Participant 41
Cluster AAgreed with
#2, #3, #4
Pushed back on
#18
Participant 43
Cluster AAgreed with
#1, #2, #3
Pushed back on
#12, #15, #20
Participant 44
Cluster AAgreed with
#1, #2, #3
Pushed back on
#10, #18, #19
Participant 47
Cluster AAgreed with
#2, #3, #4
Participant 02
Cluster BAgreed with
#8, #11, #12
Pushed back on
#7, #19
Participant 05
Cluster BAgreed with
#1, #2, #3
Pushed back on
#13, #16, #17
Participant 08
Cluster B Participant 09
Cluster BAgreed with
#14
Participant 12
Cluster BAgreed with
#5, #16, #17
Pushed back on
#20
Participant 13
Cluster BAgreed with
#1, #2, #3
Pushed back on
#8, #9, #11
Participant 14
Cluster BAgreed with
#1, #2, #3
Pushed back on
#5, #14, #16
Participant 16
Cluster BAgreed with
#1, #2, #3
Pushed back on
#9, #14, #19
Participant 17
Cluster BAgreed with
#8, #10
Participant 19
Cluster BAgreed with
#2, #6, #9
Participant 21
Cluster BAgreed with
#1, #4, #5
Pushed back on
#13, #19
Participant 24
Cluster BAgreed with
#2, #3, #5
Pushed back on
#15, #18
Participant 25
Cluster BPushed back on
#16
Participant 27
Cluster BAgreed with
#1, #4, #7
Participant 28
Cluster BAgreed with
#8
Pushed back on
#20
Participant 31
Cluster BAgreed with
#2, #3, #4
Pushed back on
#16, #20
Participant 32
Cluster BAgreed with
#1, #2, #3
Pushed back on
#14, #16, #18
Participant 35
Cluster BAgreed with
#1, #3, #4
Pushed back on
#15
Participant 37
Cluster BAgreed with
#1, #2, #3
Pushed back on
#6, #16, #17
Participant 42
Cluster BAgreed with
#1, #2, #3
Pushed back on
#17, #18, #20
Participant 46
Cluster BAgreed with
#1, #2, #4
Pushed back on
#3, #15, #17
Participant 04
Cluster CAgreed with
#1, #11, #12
Participant 20
Cluster CAgreed with
#1, #2, #3
Pushed back on
#20
Participant 30
Cluster CAgreed with
#1, #2, #3
Participant 34
Cluster CAgreed with
#1, #2, #3
Participant 36
Cluster CAgreed with
#8, #11, #18
Pushed back on
#1, #3
Participant 39
Cluster CAgreed with
#4, #6, #7
Participant 45
Cluster CAgreed with
#2, #5, #9
Participant 03
UnclusteredAgreed with
#19
Participant 29
UnclusteredAgreed with
#3, #5, #12
Participant 48
UnclusteredAgreed with
#1, #2, #3
Pushed back on
#16, #19, #20
Participant 49
UnclusteredAgreed with
#1, #2, #3
Pushed back on
#7, #19
Participant 50
UnclusteredAgreed with
#1, #2, #3
Pushed back on
#17, #19, #20
Participant 51
UnclusteredAgreed with
#1, #3, #8
Pushed back on
#18, #20
Participant 52
UnclusteredAgreed with
#2, #4, #6
Pushed back on
#19
Participant 53
UnclusteredAgreed with
#1, #3, #4
Pushed back on
#15, #16, #20
Participant 54
Unclustered Participant 55
UnclusteredAgreed with
#1, #3, #4
Pushed back on
#18, #19
Participant 56
UnclusteredAgreed with
#6, #7, #9
Pushed back on
#8, #18, #20
Participant 57
UnclusteredAgreed with
#9
Participant 58
Unclustered Participant 59
UnclusteredAgreed with
#1, #2, #3
Pushed back on
#11, #14, #18
Participant 60
UnclusteredAgreed with
#7
Pushed back on
#12
Participant 61
UnclusteredAgreed with
#17
Participant 62
UnclusteredAgreed with
#11
Pushed back on
#12
Selected participant Participant 01
Comment author
Selected participant Participant 06
Agreed with
- #7 Communities should have a voice in deciding how AI is used in their local schools and hospitals.
Selected participant Participant 07
Agreed with
- #18 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
Selected participant Participant 10
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #7 Communities should have a voice in deciding how AI is used in their local schools and hospitals.
- #12 A community that takes care of its people matters more than one with the most advanced technology.
Selected participant Participant 11
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #14 Workers who lose their jobs because of AI should get real help finding new work, not just advice.
Selected participant Participant 15
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
Pushed back on
- #19 Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
Selected participant Participant 18
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #5 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
Pushed back on
- #9 People are being harmed by AI-driven decisions while the government takes too long to act.
- #17 New AI data centres in Oxfordshire will create good jobs for local people, not just for tech workers from elsewhere.
Selected participant Participant 22
Agreed with
- #15 Using AI to keep an elderly person company when no human is available is better than leaving them alone.
Selected participant Participant 23
Agreed with
- #16 We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
Selected participant Participant 26
Agreed with
- #5 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #6 Big technology companies care more about profits than about what happens to our communities.
- #8 AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
Pushed back on
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
Selected participant Participant 33
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
- #4 AI in care homes should free up time for staff to spend with residents, not replace human contact.
Selected participant Participant 38
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
Pushed back on
- #17 New AI data centres in Oxfordshire will create good jobs for local people, not just for tech workers from elsewhere.
- #18 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
Selected participant Participant 40
Agreed with
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
- #7 Communities should have a voice in deciding how AI is used in their local schools and hospitals.
- #13 The UK should create an independent body with real power to shut down harmful AI systems.
Selected participant Participant 41
Agreed with
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
- #4 AI in care homes should free up time for staff to spend with residents, not replace human contact.
Pushed back on
- #18 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
Selected participant Participant 43
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
Pushed back on
- #12 A community that takes care of its people matters more than one with the most advanced technology.
- #15 Using AI to keep an elderly person company when no human is available is better than leaving them alone.
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
Selected participant Participant 44
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
Pushed back on
- #10 People living with dementia deserve a say in whether AI tools are used in their care.
- #18 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
- #19 Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
Selected participant Participant 47
Agreed with
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
- #4 AI in care homes should free up time for staff to spend with residents, not replace human contact.
Selected participant Participant 02
Agreed with
- #8 AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
- #11 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
- #12 A community that takes care of its people matters more than one with the most advanced technology.
Pushed back on
- #7 Communities should have a voice in deciding how AI is used in their local schools and hospitals.
- #19 Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
Selected participant Participant 05
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
Pushed back on
- #13 The UK should create an independent body with real power to shut down harmful AI systems.
- #16 We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
- #17 New AI data centres in Oxfordshire will create good jobs for local people, not just for tech workers from elsewhere.
Selected participant Participant 08
Selected participant Participant 09
Agreed with
- #14 Workers who lose their jobs because of AI should get real help finding new work, not just advice.
Selected participant Participant 12
Agreed with
- #5 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #16 We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
- #17 New AI data centres in Oxfordshire will create good jobs for local people, not just for tech workers from elsewhere.
Pushed back on
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
Selected participant Participant 13
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
Pushed back on
- #8 AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
- #9 People are being harmed by AI-driven decisions while the government takes too long to act.
- #11 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
Selected participant Participant 14
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
Pushed back on
- #5 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #14 Workers who lose their jobs because of AI should get real help finding new work, not just advice.
- #16 We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
Selected participant Participant 16
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
Pushed back on
- #9 People are being harmed by AI-driven decisions while the government takes too long to act.
- #14 Workers who lose their jobs because of AI should get real help finding new work, not just advice.
- #19 Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
Selected participant Participant 17
Agreed with
- #8 AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
- #10 People living with dementia deserve a say in whether AI tools are used in their care.
Selected participant Participant 19
Agreed with
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #6 Big technology companies care more about profits than about what happens to our communities.
- #9 People are being harmed by AI-driven decisions while the government takes too long to act.
Selected participant Participant 21
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #4 AI in care homes should free up time for staff to spend with residents, not replace human contact.
- #5 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
Pushed back on
- #13 The UK should create an independent body with real power to shut down harmful AI systems.
- #19 Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
Selected participant Participant 24
Agreed with
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
- #5 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
Pushed back on
- #15 Using AI to keep an elderly person company when no human is available is better than leaving them alone.
- #18 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
Selected participant Participant 25
Pushed back on
- #16 We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
Selected participant Participant 27
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #4 AI in care homes should free up time for staff to spend with residents, not replace human contact.
- #7 Communities should have a voice in deciding how AI is used in their local schools and hospitals.
Selected participant Participant 28
Agreed with
- #8 AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
Pushed back on
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
Selected participant Participant 31
Agreed with
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
- #4 AI in care homes should free up time for staff to spend with residents, not replace human contact.
Pushed back on
- #16 We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
Selected participant Participant 32
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
Pushed back on
- #14 Workers who lose their jobs because of AI should get real help finding new work, not just advice.
- #16 We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
- #18 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
Selected participant Participant 35
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
- #4 AI in care homes should free up time for staff to spend with residents, not replace human contact.
Pushed back on
- #15 Using AI to keep an elderly person company when no human is available is better than leaving them alone.
Selected participant Participant 37
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
Pushed back on
- #6 Big technology companies care more about profits than about what happens to our communities.
- #16 We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
- #17 New AI data centres in Oxfordshire will create good jobs for local people, not just for tech workers from elsewhere.
Selected participant Participant 42
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
Pushed back on
- #17 New AI data centres in Oxfordshire will create good jobs for local people, not just for tech workers from elsewhere.
- #18 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
Selected participant Participant 46
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #4 AI in care homes should free up time for staff to spend with residents, not replace human contact.
Pushed back on
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
- #15 Using AI to keep an elderly person company when no human is available is better than leaving them alone.
- #17 New AI data centres in Oxfordshire will create good jobs for local people, not just for tech workers from elsewhere.
Selected participant Participant 04
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #11 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
- #12 A community that takes care of its people matters more than one with the most advanced technology.
Selected participant Participant 20
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
Pushed back on
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
Selected participant Participant 30
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
Selected participant Participant 34
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
Selected participant Participant 36
Agreed with
- #8 AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
- #11 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
- #18 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
Pushed back on
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
Selected participant Participant 39
Agreed with
- #4 AI in care homes should free up time for staff to spend with residents, not replace human contact.
- #6 Big technology companies care more about profits than about what happens to our communities.
- #7 Communities should have a voice in deciding how AI is used in their local schools and hospitals.
Selected participant Participant 45
Agreed with
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #5 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #9 People are being harmed by AI-driven decisions while the government takes too long to act.
Selected participant Participant 03
Agreed with
- #19 Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
Selected participant Participant 29
Agreed with
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
- #5 Schools should teach children to question what AI tells them, not just how to use it.
- #12 A community that takes care of its people matters more than one with the most advanced technology.
Selected participant Participant 48
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
Pushed back on
- #16 We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
- #19 Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
Selected participant Participant 49
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
Pushed back on
- #7 Communities should have a voice in deciding how AI is used in their local schools and hospitals.
- #19 Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
Selected participant Participant 50
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
Pushed back on
- #17 New AI data centres in Oxfordshire will create good jobs for local people, not just for tech workers from elsewhere.
- #19 Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
Selected participant Participant 51
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
- #8 AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
Pushed back on
- #18 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
Selected participant Participant 52
Agreed with
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #4 AI in care homes should free up time for staff to spend with residents, not replace human contact.
- #6 Big technology companies care more about profits than about what happens to our communities.
Pushed back on
- #19 Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
Selected participant Participant 53
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
- #4 AI in care homes should free up time for staff to spend with residents, not replace human contact.
Pushed back on
- #15 Using AI to keep an elderly person company when no human is available is better than leaving them alone.
- #16 We should slow down on AI until we better understand what it does to people.
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
Selected participant Participant 54
Selected participant Participant 55
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
- #4 AI in care homes should free up time for staff to spend with residents, not replace human contact.
Pushed back on
- #18 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
- #19 Companies should not be allowed to replace workers with AI unless they help those workers find new roles.
Selected participant Participant 56
Agreed with
- #6 Big technology companies care more about profits than about what happens to our communities.
- #7 Communities should have a voice in deciding how AI is used in their local schools and hospitals.
- #9 People are being harmed by AI-driven decisions while the government takes too long to act.
Pushed back on
- #8 AI companies should have to pay artists and writers when they use their work to train AI systems.
- #18 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
- #20 AI tools in schools do more to help struggling students catch up than they do to harm learning.
Selected participant Participant 57
Agreed with
- #9 People are being harmed by AI-driven decisions while the government takes too long to act.
Selected participant Participant 58
Selected participant Participant 59
Agreed with
- #1 People should always be able to reach a real person when dealing with a government service, even if AI handles most tasks.
- #2 When AI helps make a decision about your benefits, housing, or health, you should be told.
- #3 When I talk to a chatbot or AI assistant, I should always be told it is not a real person.
Pushed back on
- #11 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
- #14 Workers who lose their jobs because of AI should get real help finding new work, not just advice.
- #18 Families caring for someone with a serious illness should be offered AI tools to help, even if those tools are not perfect.
Selected participant Participant 60
Agreed with
- #7 Communities should have a voice in deciding how AI is used in their local schools and hospitals.
Pushed back on
- #12 A community that takes care of its people matters more than one with the most advanced technology.
Selected participant Participant 61
Agreed with
- #17 New AI data centres in Oxfordshire will create good jobs for local people, not just for tech workers from elsewhere.
Selected participant Participant 62
Agreed with
- #11 If an AI system treats people unfairly because of their race, age, or disability, someone should be held responsible.
Pushed back on
- #12 A community that takes care of its people matters more than one with the most advanced technology.
Method
Method and limits
This page aims for a Habermolt-like reading experience, but it stays honest about what Polis exports can and cannot provide.
CSV sources
What this reconstruction does
- Comments become statements.
- The leading statement is ranked by overall support plus the weakest support across discovered Polis clusters.
- The statement and participant maps are simple two-dimensional projections of vote vectors, so proximity means similar voting patterns, not exact ideological distance.
- What is missing compared with Habermolt: agent names, authored opinions, semantic embeddings, and native ranking history.
No hidden APIs were used. Everything on the page is derived from the five export files above.
